How you can make sense of the Antonio Brown helmet controversy

Well, you can’t say the NFL doesn’t provide unique stories to consume and discuss. Antonio Brown, new Raiders receiver, has been away from the team dealing with a foot issue. If you’ve seen the photos, you know it’s legit. The Raiders haven’t officially said what happened, but the team and Brown are dealing with what is reported to be frostbite. We knew this. And now we know so much more.

On Friday, we got a glimpse into an odd issue that’s keeping Brown off the field. It started with Mike Silver’s tweet storm, followed up by his article and further reporting by Adam Schefter: Brown’s preferred helmet isn’t available anymore and he threatened to sit out until he’s allowed to wear it.

By Monday, his grievance was denied and Brown said he’ll be on the field this season:

Due to player safety, Brown was never going to win his grievance

We know player safety is a major priority for the NFL and that includes the equipment players wear. The NFL tests helmets and gives them ratings. If they don’t meet standards or if they are older than 10 years, they can’t be worn.

Before the 2018 season, the model of helmet worn by Brown, as well as quarterbacks Tom Brady and Aaron Rodgers, was outlawed. However, the NFL allowed them to wear this helmet for 2018 only. Now that it’s the 2019 season, all of those players are required to switch helmets — and Brown doesn’t want to.

Based on Silver’s and Schefter’s reporting, it’s been anything but smooth with this helmet situation. It went so far as Brown painting his old helmet in Raiders colors and trying to get onto the practice field with it, but that of course didn’t work.

See also  FPX vs G2 (Chung kết CKTG 2019): LPL khó bảo vệ ngôi vô địch

Brown filed a grievance against the NFL over the helmet issue, and as expected, he didn’t win. There was no way he was going to, either: It would’ve set a precedent that anyone else can do the same and wear a helmet that’s not approved.

The problem with this helmet is that it’s past the 10-year age limit, so Brown has to wear a different kind. But Brown believes the new certified helmet protrudes out and interferes with his vision as he tries to catch the football, according to Schefter.

Athletes are superstitious by nature

I understand where Brown is coming from here.

Our equipment is part of our superstition and routine. I wore the same style of gloves. I taped my hands the same way every day. On gameday, I had a different person tape my hands than in practice. Wrinkles weren’t allowed in the tape, ever, or else we’d start over. I warmed up for games at the exact same time. I’d put my pads on 20 minutes before we needed to be out.

So if Brown thinks that a new helmet would interfere with his vision and if it’s presumably uncomfortable for him, I totally get it, as do most players. All of us have had to switch helmets as technology has improved and made them safer.

But even if I understand Brown’s hesitation to switch helmets, he’s going to have to comply to play in the future. He can’t paint his old helmet again, or try to sneak the helmet on the field, like some have suggested he do. The Raiders, and the NFL, won’t allow him to play without the proper headgear.

See also  Trí tuệ nhân tạo lại cướp đi việc làm của một ngành nghề rất "sang chảnh": Đang kiếm 10 triệu/giờ, nay khóc ròng vì sắp thất nghiệp!

What could Brown have even done? What about the Raiders?

Brown could’ve followed through and retired, but he would’ve forfeited over $30 million in guaranteed money. In most early retirements, signing bonus money must be repaid but Brown didn’t receive a large bonus, so that wouldn’t have affected him as much. However, his salary over the next few seasons is guaranteed, which he wouldn’t have received without playing.

The Raiders had some recourse here. They weren’t going to cut him because they would’ve owed him all that guaranteed money. But they could’ve put Brown on the NFL’s reserve/left squad list. It would’ve shelve Brown for the season and the Raiders wouldn’t have had to pay him. The problem is they wouldn’t have been able to bring him back during the season if he changed his mind.

That would’ve been a last resort for the Raiders, though. They’ve been supportive of him, throughout the whole ordeal and they want Brown to play this season. That’s why they traded for him.

I’ve never seen a player threaten to retire because of an equipment issue. And while I think it was always highly improbable, Brown was interviewed in March during the trade drama with the Steelers and said he doesn’t need to play football. This story is so odd that it’s hard to predict if it’s really over.

Comments are closed.
Ky Phu,Nho Quan,Ninh Binh, Viet Nam Country
+84.229 6333 111


[formidable id=8 title=true description=true]
Trang An Golf and Resort